Home World

U.S. Intelligence Anxiety Shows CIA’s Renewed Struggle for Dominance

U.S. intelligence revisits Cold War tactics amid geopolitical shifts, countering Russia-China influence in Africa as part of the CIA’s renewed struggle for dominance, foreshadowing significant global repercussions.

By Srijan Sharma
New Update
CIA's anxiety

U.S. Intelligence Anxiety Shows CIA’s Renewed Struggle for Dominance | Representative image | Photo courtesy: Left, Wikimedia Commons; Right: CIA

Listen to this article
0.75x 1x 1.5x
00:00 / 00:00

After decades of the Cold War and the emergence of a new version of geopolitical tension, the U.S. intelligence appears to be revisiting their efforts to maintain their sphere of influence. This comes as new geopolitical frontiers open, with two wars already underway in the background. The CIA's recent activities in Africa, along with its growing interest in African politics and efforts to counter the Russia-China alliance, reveal a palpable sense of "intelligence anxiety" building up inside Langley. These developments are poised to have huge repercussions for the world.

The Intelligence Desperation: Cold War Days

Post-World War II, an ideological challenge to the West emerged in the form of communism spearheaded by the Soviet Union. The Soviet view of the global order was perceived as a threat to the U.S-led West, which was articulated in a famous speech by former U.S. President Harry S. Truman. Truman declared, "it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures." This March 12, 1947, speech is widely regarded by historians as marking the beginning of the Cold War.

Truman’s vision evolved into a cornerstone of U.S foreign policy, establishing the foundation for competition with the Soviets. According to the Truman Doctrine, the U.S. pledged to support democracies against authoritarian regimes. This policy was later refined to fit the Cold War context by the renowned U.S. diplomat George Kennan, who developed the containment strategy. This strategy advocated for containing the spread of communism in Eastern Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

The first encounter with the currents of the Cold War perhaps began with the Korean War of 1950, which created ripples in the U.S strategic and intelligence community. The primary objectives were to keep China at bay and support South Korea against the Soviet-backed North Korea. This situation underscored the need for a robust intelligence network. The CIA recognised that to make the containment policy successful, it needed to bolster the CIA's intelligence presence both offensively and defensively against the KGB.

Soon after, the CIA embarked on its most lethal and highly classified project, known as MK Ultra, preceded by a similar mind control program, Project Artichoke, in 1953. Through these projects, the CIA conducted illegal human experiments aimed at developing procedures and identifying drugs that could be used during interrogations to weaken individuals and force confessions through brainwashing and psychological torture. Although these projects were halted after a brief period due to various controversies, they revealed signs of the intelligence anxiety and desperation within the CIA.

However, the real struggle was yet to come. In 1957, the Soviet Union successfully tested its Sputnik satellite, marking its presence in space and becoming the first nation to send a living organism into space. This achievement further intensified the competition between the superpowers, showcasing the escalating tensions of the Cold War era.

The Soviet intelligence agency, the KGB, employed a strategy known as Active Measures, which aimed to conduct propaganda and psychological operations in the U.S. These active measures yielded significant results. One notable Soviet-designed propaganda campaign, known as Operation Denver, spread the false idea that HIV/AIDS was invented by the U.S. as a biological weapon. As part of this disinformation campaign, the KGB, through affiliated Soviet press and Soviet bloc intelligence agencies, disseminated publications that claimed to be independent investigative work. The goal was to divert attention away from the Soviets' own biological weapons program.

Similarly, the Soviets successfully sowed seeds of mistrust between the U.S and Britain by infiltrating the famous spy ring known as the Cambridge Five. This operation deepened the mistrust between the Western allies and showcased the effectiveness of the KGB's Active Measures in undermining the cohesion and trust among the Western powers.

PRICK Alliance: Pakistan, Russia, Iran and China

Internally, the CIA faced tough competition from the Soviet KGB. The CIA's failures in the Bay of Pigs Invasion and in attempts to assassinate Fidel Castro, as well as the CIA's inability to secure victory in the Vietnam War in 1968, highlighted significant shortcomings. The Tet Offensive, where communist forces of Vietnam backed by the USSR launched a massive assault against South Vietnam, stunned the United States. Perhaps the most significant failure came in 1979 when the CIA failed to predict or foresee the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. These Cold War-era challenges put the U.S. sphere of influence under severe threat, showcasing American desperation and frustration in maintaining its global standing.

Decades later, we witness a near reflection of those Cold War days. U.S's geopolitical influence is again under threat, this time from the growing closeness between Russia and China. Strategic experts point to a new alliance forming, informally known as PRICK—Pakistan, Russia, Iran and China. These geopolitical realignments, compounded by pressures from Israel and Ukraine, have created a renewed struggle for the CIA to maintain and advance U.S. strategic and political interests globally.

In the Middle East, the U.S. faces a trust deficit in intelligence and strategic cooperation with Israel's top security establishments, such as Mossad. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not aligning with U.S. directives, and reports suggest that Netanyahu has even instructed his security chiefs, including the Mossad Chief, to limit interactions with top U.S. intelligence officials. Meanwhile, in Ukraine, the situation is precarious, with Russia launching a new offensive following Putin's election victory. This development has led CIA Director William Burns to express concerns about Ukraine potentially losing the war by year's end.

These geopolitical and strategic challenges, coupled with inconsistent U.S. responses, reveal th

login-icon

Unlock this story for free.

Simply log in with your email ID and immerse yourself in a world where exclusive insights and compelling narratives come alive.