Virginity Test in India: “My cousin sister was beaten up on the first night of her wedding in front of me. They found that she did not bleed and asked her with whom she had sexual intercourse before marriage. They tortured and tormented her, which remained a childhood scar on me for a very long period,” says Vivek Tamaichikar, founder of the “Stop the V-Ritual” campaign.
Vivek Tamaichikar, Founder of the “Stop the V-Ritual” campaign speaks to The Probe’s Pavitra Utgikar on the practice of V-Ritual widely prevalent in Kanjarbhat community.
“My partner and I decided to protest against it and started the “Stop the V-Ritual” campaign. When we launched the campaign and called for a meeting, some of our community members came to take part, but then they got a call from the caste panchayat, and those who were part of this group were asked to apologise publicly,” rues Tamaichikar.
For years, Tamaichikar has been facing a social boycott after he started protesting against the V-Ritual campaign. “I don’t get invited to any functions of my community. There is a lot of pressure from the community’s caste panchayat to keep my wife and me away from public functions. When my grandmother passed away, the caste panchayat announced that those who would attend my grandmother’s funeral would be boycotted. Because of this, nobody attended my grandmother’s funeral. Finally, the Ministry of Home Affairs took note of this case and asked us if we were willing to get an FIR registered in the matter, and we did,” said Tamaichikar speaking to The Probe.
The Maharashtra Protection of People from Social Boycott (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act of 2016 was passed to protect people who face social boycotts. The Act also makes social boycotts a punishable offence. But, in the Kanjarbhat community, the practice is widely prevalent, and the law has not been able to catch up with the ones who impose social boycotts on those members who carry out the dehumanising V-Ritual.
Such virginity tests and rituals are not just carried out in communities such as the Kanjarbhat community in India. Dr Indrajit Khandekar, a Professor in the Forensic Medicine Department at the Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (MGIMS), started a fight against the two-finger test after feeling outraged by the way private parts of rape survivors were being touched without their consent during medical tests.
Dr Khandekar, for years, has been fighting against the invasive two-finger test. Speaking to The Probe, he says that when he interviewed rape victims as part of his work, most victims from marginalised backgrounds were unaware of why the tests were being conducted.
Also Read | Should marital rape be criminalised?
“I have interacted with many rape victims. When I asked some of them what they thought about the two-finger test, almost all of them told me that it is a very painful and traumatic experience when doctors insert fingers into their vaginas. These women from low-income families thought it was just a medical examination, and they were unaware of what the doctors were trying to ascertain through the two-finger test. They were not aware that the doctors were trying to find out if the victim was habitual to sexual intercourse,” adds Dr Khandekar.
While Dr Khandekar notes that the Maharashtra government formulated guidelines, they are hardly followed as the implementers, i.e. the law enforcement agencies and the doctors, need to be trained. What’s worse, in many cases, courts themselves in the past have ordered virginity tests on rape victims.
Early this February, the Delhi High Court made Virginity Test in India on women accused of crimes or in custody unconstitutional, stating that it violated her fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the constitution. Until now, the courts had banned virginity tests on sexual assault victims, but through the latest judgement, it was extended to women accused of crimes. But Manisha Gupte, Founder and Co-Convenor of Mahila Sarvangeen Utkarsh Mandal (Masum), states that when law enforcement agencies use this test to solve rape cases, it once again re-victimises a victim.
Sangeeta Rege, Director of the Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT), states that the intrusion on women’s bodies has been institutionalised by many government agencies, which has also given social sanction to patriarchal families and communities to carry out these tests without fear of the law.
“I don’t understand the rationale behind the two-finger test. Despite the Supreme Court judgement in 1995 and the criminal procedure code in India actually laying down procedures as to what must be the components of medical examination, why is the two-finger test done?” asks Rege.
Rege notes that while during Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP), doctors must mandatorily undergo training sessions and conduct the MTP under a superior, these trainings are not mandatory for medical practitioners who carry out the examination in rape cases.
“While all this is one issue, a study conducted by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in India found that many mothers were coming with their daughters for hymenal reconstruction. I have seen cases where the mothers have insisted that the procedure be done so that the daughter is understood as a virgin, and this mostly happens among the elite,” adds Rege.
Dr Amrinder Kaur Bajaj, an Obstetrics and Gynecology doctor based out of Gurgaon, says that more than law, awareness is required to do away with the practice of virginity tests. “Princess Diana had got her test done because she had to carry forward the royal family’s lineage. A family came to me just a day after the wedding night and brought the bride to me to know if she was a virgin or if she had an abortion or a delivery before. There’s a custom in Maharashtra where they won’t let the couple sleep together till the woman has her first period. These social ills can be eradicated only through education and awareness.”