Wayanad Lessons: Prioritise Disaster Mitigation Over Management

• Wayanad in Kerala witnessed one of its worst-ever landslides on July 30, killing more than 350 people so far and flattening at least three villages.
• Some experts call for the need of an early warning system for landslides, similar to that for rains. However, in the recent disaster, the origin of the landslide is predictable, but its pathway is not easy to predict, say experts.
• Excessive rainfall, which led to the landslide, has also been attributed to the increasing depth of clouds over the southeastern part of the Arabian sea, caused by warming of the sea.

Areas previously with human habitation, turning into bare, flattened mud grounds, scattered with rock boulders, are now a familiar sight for the people of Kerala. The 2018 deluge that killed over 450 people shifted the state to a disaster-vulnerable state, with a consecutive flood in 2019 and devastating landslides in the years following.

We Have a Request for You: Keep Our Journalism Alive
We are a small, dedicated team at The Probe, committed to in-depth, slow journalism that dives deeper than daily headlines. We can't sustain our vital work without your support. Please consider contributing to our social impact projects: Support Us or Become a Member of The Probe. Even your smallest support will help us keep our journalism alive.

The state woke up to similar sights on July 30 when a catastrophic landslide occurred in the serene, northern district of Wayanad. According to the press statement from the Chief Minister’s Office, early on August 2, 199 people have been reported as dead so far. Another 86 people are undergoing treatment. Acccording to latest figures in the public domain, over 350 people have lost their lives.

The state quickly resorted to rescue operations and risk management, even as experts and environmentalists criticised the government for not developing a strategy for risk mitigation.

When others tell you what happened, The Probe reveals why it happened. Stay informed—join our WhatsApp channel today. Click to join: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaXEzAk90x2otXl7Lo0L

The origin of the calamity is reported to be the Iruvazhinjhi river which flows down to three villages named Mundakkai, Chooralmala, and Attamala in Vythiri taluk and merges with the Chaliyar river. Twenty-six dead bodies, along with several unidentified body parts, were found in the Chaliyar river at Pothukallu in Malappuram, a nearby district. The landslide also completely buried a government vocational higher secondary school. Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan called it one of the worst disasters the state ever witnessed. The state has previously witnessed devastating landslides in Pettimudi in the Idukki district in 2020, which killed 66 people, in Kavalappara in Malappuram in 2019, which killed 46 people, and Puthumala in Wayanad, in which 11 people lost their lives. Relentless, heavy monsoon triggered these landslides.

Sridhar Radhakrishnan, an environmentalist, considers the landslide as the outcome of the state overlooking risk mitigation. “The approach should be about setting up risk assessments and mitigative measures, creating a resilient strategy, but instead, it is about disaster management, and the state has mastered it,” he stated.

Sridhar pointed out that a landslide happened in the same region in 1984, and because of the landslide in Puthumala in 2019, the region has been identified as a landslide-prone area, which means that the authorities have to be more vigilant about these regions when there are incessant heavy rains. He suggested shifting people from these regions to safer areas gradually but permanently. “The rehabilitation didn’t happen even in the high-priority areas. When something like this happens, you should have an early warning system. There should be a warning system for landslides which is same as in the case of heavy rains. It happened not because of a human error but because of human negligence. If warnings had been taken seriously, there would have been enough time to move people out. Landslides can’t be avoided, but causalities can,” he added.

Could the disaster have been avoided?

The Hume Centre for Ecology and Wildlife Biology has been collecting, analysing, and sharing data on rainfall in Wayanad district, since 2018. “We have a daily updating system. The updates are put on a group in which all the stakeholders, like the District Collector and Disaster Management Authority people, are there. We have a clear daily analysis, providing separate data on highly saturated regions, averages about panchayat, and district-wise details. Also, we have a grid that analyses the rainfall every 25 kilometres. Even on July 31, two regions crossed 4000 millimetres (mm) of rainfall; in two other places the rainfall was 3600 mm; this is heavy. Normally, rainfall would come to 3000 mm in the monsoon. But this year, it has been consistently heavy rains, and by July 20, soil became saturated in all regions. Soil saturation water-bearing capacity means streams would originate, water flows out of them, and heavy water inflow in all rivers,” C.K. Vishnudas, Director of Hume explained. 

The district had witnessed landslides in the same region in 2020, and the authorities shifted people because of the alerts provided by Hume, he claimed. “This year, our warning has specific details about soil saturation and the vulnerable regions, naming the villages that have been cut off. We had given an update about the intensive rainfall and a warning that this could be the expected rainfall in the region overnight, which could trigger a landslide,” he added. But there has yet to be a proactive step from the authorities. “This is something we could have avoided, I stand by that,” he asserted.

Meanwhile, in a Rajya Sabha speech on July 31, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said that the Centre gave early warnings to the Kerala government on July 23, seven days before the incident. On July 26, he said, a warning was given there was a chance of heavy rainfall of more than 20 centimetres and there were chances of landslides. He questioned why there was inaction by the state government despite the warnings.

However, the state Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, refuted the claim, saying that the Union Home Minister has presented information in the Parliament that is inconsistent with the facts. The CM added that the India Meteorological Department’s warning was that rainfall would be between 115 and 204 mm. However, the actual rainfall – 572 mm in 48 hours – was much higher. The area received 200 mm of rain in the first 24 hours and 372 mm in the next 24 hours.

“The area had never been on red alert before the disaster. However, after the incident, a red alert was issued at six o’clock in the morning (of July 30) after the landslides occurred,” the CM said in a press conference. “On July 29 at 2 pm, the Geological Survey of India issued a green alert for July 30 and 31, indicating a possibility of minor landslides or rock bursts. However, by that time, heavy rain had already occurred, and the landslide had taken place,” the CM told the media. From July 23 to 29, the Central Water Commission, responsible for issuing flood warnings, did not issue any warnings for either Iruvazhinji Puzha or Chaliyar, he added.

Warming Arabian Sea

S. Abhilash, Director of the Advanced Centre for Atmospheric Radar Research at the Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT) attributed the excessive rainfall to the cloudbursts from high water accumulation over the southeastern part of the Arabian Sea. The Arabian sea lies to the west of Kerala. Earlier research by Abhilash and others found that rainfall over the west coast of India is becoming more convective.

“Cloudbursts occurring under favourable ocean-atmospheric conditions may leave a vast area of the state vulnerable to flash floods and landslides anytime during the monsoon season. The paper (published in 2022) was based on the Kavalappara and Puthumala landslide. Post that, such disasters kept occurring, landslides happened in Pettimudi in (Idukki district) 2020 in Koottickal in (Kottayam district) 2021, and a major cloudburst in Kalamassery in Kochi (the first-ever cloudburst in the state in May 2024). As an indication of cloudburst, we cited the increasing depth of clouds forming in the southeastern Arabian Sea, causing increasing rainfall,” he noted. 

According to Abhilash, the warming of the Arabian Sea and the increasing depth of cloud is a clear signal of climate change. “Earlier, the clouds in the southeastern part of the Arabian Sea were mostly formed in the northern region, which caused frequent landslides in the Konkan region. A mesoscale mini cloudburst has the potential to trigger a landslide or cause a flood if the rainfall is ten to 15 centimetres in one hour, considering the vulnerability of the Western Ghats. Mini cloudbursts in this region will have the same impact that the major cloudbursts have in the Himalayan region,” he said.

He also wondered why the authorities did not issuing a warning, sensing the pattern of the rains. “This is not because of the lack of data; we should be able to sense from the rain pattern. The alert system is not reaching the last mile people,” he said. A source in the government, who preferred anonymity, rejected this claim, saying that appropriate action was taken, and the deaths occurred six kilometres away from the area where the landslide originated.

Landslide impacts in areas away from predicted origin

Sajin Kumar K.S., a geologist and Assistant Professor at the University of Kerala, also said that the recent landslide occurred six kilometres inside a dense forest. “Factors ignored were those that could be ignored. There was no anthropogenic influence. There are many landslide susceptibility maps prepared by different methods, and if you place the latitude and longitude of the (recent) landslide, it falls exactly under the high landslide zone of that area.” He noted that while the landslide prediction was accurate, the impact of the landslide that flowed beyond the point of origin, was in regions, which are not usually landslide prone, such as Chooralmala, because of the way it flowed.

In 2018, Sajin Kumar coordinated a five-day study about landslides in Idukki during the floods that year and concluded that human activity and presence was the reason for the landslides in Idukki.

Talking about the recent disaster, Sajin Kumar said, “Two things went wrong. One is people living on the banks of rivers on the plains where water can flow during the heavy monsoon seasons. Two, we don’t have a map predicting the flow path of the landslide, the direction it flows, we lack that modeling. This is an area of active interest worldwide. Almost all developing countries are about to develop such a map, but we are in the infant stage. All the devastating landslides occurred in the non-susceptible areas, especially Pettimudi, Puthumala, and the latest one – the origin of the landslide was in a susceptible area, the casualty occurred in a landslide-free zone,” he pointed out.

The non-implementation of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) report, led by prominent ecologist Madhav Gadgil, which warned against anti-environmental activities in eco-sensitive areas in Wayanad, has also been brought up by experts, after the recent landslide. Environmentalist Sridhar Radhakrishnan attributes the non-implementation to successive state governments.

Sajin Kumar, however, has a different view. “There is no evidence of anthropogenic influence; the (recent) landslide occurred in deep forests where human beings didn’t even enter. Not only Gadgil’s report but any Geological Survey of India (GSI) map shows it as a landslide-prone area. Any map will say that. But that is not the point. We failed to identify the areas that the landslide will flow down to. The government should shift people and take precautionary measures based on quantifying the rainfall threshold, and how much is required to trigger a landslide. The government authorities acted based on this rainfall prediction, on July 30, rehabilitating people from six residential areas. The government issued an orange alert for the region though it later turned into a red alert,” he said. “Technically the government does not have the authority to move people living in the ‘safer zones’,” he added, referring to the non-landslide prone zones, where, in fact, the impact of the recent landslide was seen as the landslide flowed. The origin of the landslide is predictable but its pathway, which are the areas through which it will move, is not predictable and hence it is not always possible to send alerts for those areas, he explained.

“An insert soil moisture testing instrument can be used to check soil water content and threshold. But the most important is landslide runout zone mapping,” he suggested. Landslide runout analysis is used to simulate the motion of past landslides to predict the motion of potential future landslides. This is often required in the context of a landslide hazard or risk assessment.

Abhilash said that the authorities failed in risk mitigation which experts have been advocating for since the Cyclone Ockhi in 2017. He hoped calamities of lesser magnitude in the future should not be trivialised solely because the state witnessed something of this magnitude.

This article originally appeared in Mongabay. Click here for the link to the original article. 

Dive deeper with The Probe. For thoughtful analysis and in-depth stories directly to your phone, join our WhatsApp channel. Click and Connect with us Today: [WhatsApp Channel Link] 🔗

At The Probe, our commitment to social impact journalism is at the core of everything we do. Funded by well-meaning individuals from the public, our aim is to drive positive social change and make a real-world impact through the stories we report. 

If you wish to support us, please visit our Truth Brigade page and contribute to a cause that resonates with you the most. It is through your support that we have been able to keep the flame of our journalism alive in these difficult times. Click link to support us to make a difference: https://theprobe.in/truth-brigade