data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38e6b/38e6b7ac262f501ba9b4e1f98b49e48c38b41e9b" alt="Ranveer Allahbadia | The Probe"/theprobe/media/media_files/2025/02/11/f6Z4DJVJbqxIrHhpc7CL.jpg)
Ranveer Allahbadia | Photo courtesy: ranveerallahbadia | Instagram
Ranveer Allahbadia Row: A Wake-Up Call
The controversy surrounding Ranveer Allahbadia, better known as Beer Biceps, has sparked a wide-reaching conversation that transcends political, celebrity, and everyday circles. From politicians to social media influencers, and even the common man, voices are rising in response to the offensive comments made by the podcaster and entrepreneur. While some may argue that he doesn’t deserve the attention, the fact remains that his words, once shared in the public domain, cannot be ignored. This situation isn’t just about one individual’s crass remark; it’s about the broader implications on free speech, public discourse, and the responsibility that comes with having a platform. The disturbing part isn't only the comment itself but the fact that some found it laughable, which speaks volumes about where our collective moral compass stands today.
Allahbadia’s comments on comedian Samay Raina’s YouTube show India’s Got Latent triggered an intense backlash that cannot be dismissed as a mere misstep. His question to a contestant, asking if they would rather "watch your parents have sex every day for the rest of your life, or would you join in once to stop it forever?" was not just vulgar, but deeply troubling in its audacity. What makes this even more alarming is the platform Ranveer Allahbadia holds—he’s far from an average influencer. With over 4.5 million followers on Instagram and more than 12 million subscribers across multiple YouTube channels, his reach is vast. His influence is undeniable, and it’s precisely because of his prominence that his actions take on a larger significance. To add insult to injury, Allahbadia’s accomplishments have been publicly recognised, even honoured with the Disruptor of the Year award by Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the National C
Ranveer Allahbadia Row: A Wake-Up Call
The controversy surrounding Ranveer Allahbadia, better known as Beer Biceps, has sparked a wide-reaching conversation that transcends political, celebrity, and everyday circles. From politicians to social media influencers, and even the common man, voices are rising in response to the offensive comments made by the podcaster and entrepreneur. While some may argue that he doesn’t deserve the attention, the fact remains that his words, once shared in the public domain, cannot be ignored. This situation isn’t just about one individual’s crass remark; it’s about the broader implications on free speech, public discourse, and the responsibility that comes with having a platform. The disturbing part isn't only the comment itself but the fact that some found it laughable, which speaks volumes about where our collective moral compass stands today.
Allahbadia’s comments on comedian Samay Raina’s YouTube show India’s Got Latent triggered an intense backlash that cannot be dismissed as a mere misstep. His question to a contestant, asking if they would rather "watch your parents have sex every day for the rest of your life, or would you join in once to stop it forever?" was not just vulgar, but deeply troubling in its audacity. What makes this even more alarming is the platform Ranveer Allahbadia holds—he’s far from an average influencer. With over 4.5 million followers on Instagram and more than 12 million subscribers across multiple YouTube channels, his reach is vast. His influence is undeniable, and it’s precisely because of his prominence that his actions take on a larger significance. To add insult to injury, Allahbadia’s accomplishments have been publicly recognised, even honoured with the Disruptor of the Year award by Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the National Creators Award just last year. This recognition, coupled with his massive following, places an added responsibility on him, making it crucial to examine the impact of such reckless behaviour on his audience and on society as a whole.
While Ranveer Allahbadia has issued an apology for his crass remarks, the outrage surrounding his comments is only intensifying. Calls for punitive action are gaining momentum—some are demanding jail time, while others believe he should be banned from social media altogether. FIRs have been filed against him, and following complaints from several Members of Parliament, a Parliamentary panel on information technology is considering whether to summon him. Even celebrities like Punjabi singer B Praak have condemned Allahbadia, calling his comments “pathetic” and backing out of a scheduled appearance on his show.
We Have a Request for You: Keep Our Journalism Alive
We are a small, dedicated team at The Probe, committed to in-depth, slow journalism that dives deeper than daily headlines. We can't sustain our vital work without your support. Please consider contributing to our social impact projects: Support Us or Become a Member of The Probe. Even your smallest support will help us keep our journalism alive.
This raises an important question: Does Allahbadia’s behaviour amount to a violation of freedom of speech? If so, what steps should be taken to hold him accountable? Discussions are also circulating about the appropriate punishment for someone of his stature, given that his apology clearly hasn’t sufficed to quell the storm. However, amid all the outcry, it’s evident that Allahbadia’s fame has only skyrocketed as a result of this controversy. This is the troubling reality we face—many influencers, including Ranveer Allahbadia, often make outlandish statements and engage in eyebrow-raising actions precisely to stir controversy and boost their following.
In the end, Allahbadia may receive a minor punishment—if any at all—and life will go on. This incident will likely fade from the collective memory, and the influencer will continue his work. However, there is a larger question here about the long-term consequences of this. Will this case serve as a turning point for enforcing stricter regulations on social media? Or will it be another example of how fleeting outrage can be, especially in the fast-paced digital age? As we debate the potential consequences, we must also ask: what kind of responsibility do influencers have when it comes to the messages they broadcast to millions? The answer may not lie in short-term punishments or even in a fundamental shift in how we regulate and hold accountable those who shape the public discourse. Rather, as a society, we must collectively ask ourselves: Who is this crass content being made for? Is it not for our eyeballs, yours and mine? Are we, or at least some of us, equally responsible for promoting such content? By engaging with and elevating these influencers, we enable them to sink to new lows in the pursuit of attention. The problem isn't just the content itself—it's the audience that rewards it, giving these creators the platform and validation to continue with their disgusting content.
In a democracy, freedom of speech is a fundamental right. Article 19(1)(a) of our Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, but it is not absolute. This right comes with reasonable restrictions, especially when speech threatens public order, decency, or morality. In the case of Ranveer Allahbadia, the government could impose such restrictions if it deems his comments to be in violation of these principles. But beyond the legal questions, the true issue at hand is the broader culture among influencers and comedians who, knowingly or unknowingly, use their platforms to spread harmful messages.
Stay informed with The Probe. Get original stories, exclusive insights, and thoughtful, in-depth analysis delivered straight to your phone. Join our WhatsApp channel now! Click the link to join: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaXEzAk90x2otXl7Lo0L
Being an influencer or celebrity comes with a responsibility. When these individuals make statements, especially ones that cross moral and ethical boundaries, it’s important to consider the ripple effect their words can have on their audience. Influencers, by virtue of their widespread reach, wield massive influence—especially when their content is easily accessible to young, impressionable viewers. The absence of warnings, disclaimers, or context only compounds the issue. It's one thing to make a joke in a controlled environment, but when that content is broadcast across social media without any safeguards, the consequences can be far-reaching.
The larger issue is that many comedians and influencers use their platforms to demean, body-shame, and insult vulnerable sections of society. There’s a disturbing trend of comedians employing below-the-belt humour, often targeting people based on their appearance, race, gender, or sexual orientation. Some stand-up acts and comedy shows perpetuate racial stereotypes or use language that’s offensive and degrading. Even the so-called comedy stalwarts, like Kapil Sharma, have been caught indulging in body-shaming, as seen in his interaction with filmmaker Atlee. Additionally, content produced by platforms like All India Bakchod has been called out for crossing lines of decency, with many of their sketches containing offensive, sexist, and homophobic language.
While comedy is often intended to push boundaries and provoke thought, it’s important to recognise where the line is drawn between humour and harm. The responsibility lies with both the creators and the platforms that host them to ensure that their content does not perpetuate negativity or harm vulnerable communities. The question we need to ask ourselves is: as a society, how far are we willing to allow the misuse of free speech to go in the name of humour or entertainment?
While Allahbadia’s remarks have caught the public’s attention, he’s far from an isolated case—there are many others like him who push the limits of decency in the name of comedy or free speech. Unfortunately, such content often gets lost in the flood of information we consume daily. So, as a society, what do we do? What power do we hold as an audience? One solution is simple: we stop watching crass content designed to attract attention at any cost. We unfollow these individuals, avoid their shows, and stop subscribing to their channels.
Instead, we should seek out and support creators and organisations that focus on producing quality content—content that may not be designed to go viral, but is thoughtful, responsible, and enriching. While it may not always have the mass appeal of viral content, these creators offer something of substance, and we, as a collective audience, have the power to uplift them. If we continue to indulge influencers like Ranveer Allahbadia, we only reinforce their behaviour. They will retreat momentarily, perhaps, but they will be back, perhaps even more popular than before, capitalising on the very support that we inadvertently provide. It’s time to rethink where we direct our attention, as the power to shape this digital landscape lies in our hands.