Home Environment

Aditya Birla Group: Massive Coal Mine Plan Sparks Concerns

Aditya Birla Group proposes a coal mining project in Madhya Pradesh's Singrauli district, sparking environmental concerns, including deforestation, displacement, and inadequate compensation for affected communities.

By Ayaskant Das
New Update
Aditya Birla Group - Coal Mining

Aditya Birla Group: Massive Coal Mine Plan Sparks Concerns | Coal Mining | Representative image | Photo courtesy: Special arrangement

Listen to this article
0.75x 1x 1.5x
00:00 / 00:00

Aditya Birla Group Project Draws Concerns

The Madhya Pradesh government has flagged concerns about the diversion of forest land for a coal mining project proposed by the Aditya Birla Group in an elephant corridor in the state’s Singrauli district. As per preliminary surveys, more than 1.10 lakh trees belonging to different species will be felled and thousands of people will be displaced for the open-cast mining project. 

Further, the state government has also highlighted the presence of important water bodies flowing through the proposed mine lease area. These water bodies replenish underground water tables and provide sustenance to the dense forest in the region. In addition, project-affected communities, who are not satisfied with the rates of compensation finalised against private land to be acquired, have raised the issue with the Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister’s office. 

Elephant Corridor and Wildlife Concerns

The presence of an elephant corridor within the proposed mining lease area was highlighted in a site inspection report compiled jointly by the Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) of Singrauli Forest Division and the Chief Conservator of Forests (CCF) of the Rewa Forest Range.

Though the Forest Advisory Committee (FAC), which evaluates the potential impacts of infrastructure projects upon forest land on behalf of the Union Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change (“the ministry”), took cognizance of these findings in the site inspection report, it has not recommended any further studies or analyses.

FAC Meeting Findings

“As per the site inspection report of DFO, Singrauli, and CCF Rewa, the working plan prescription shows that compartment nos. RF [Reserved Forest] - 291, 292, 293 & 391 fall in the Elephant Corridor. However, no movement of elephants has been noticed in the last 10 years. The working plan also prescribes, in case the diversion of the said area is essentially required, an alternative Elephant Corridor may be formed. The DFO and CCF have recommended the proposal on the condition of compliance with the above condition,” states the minutes of an FAC meeting held on 7 June 2024.

The FAC has also ignored findings that several species of wild animals have been sighted in the region of the mining lease area. “... as per enquiry with local forest staff, the wildlife in the area include occasional movement of leopards, sloth bear, spotted deer, nilgai, wild pigs, etc.,” the minutes further state, quoting the site inspection report.

EMIL's Response Awaited

A questionnaire was emailed by this correspondent to Essel Mining Industries Limited (EMIL), a subsidiary company of the Aditya Birla Group, asking amongst other queries, to comment on what steps have been proposed for the conservation of the elephant corridor and wildlife found in the region.

No responses had been received at the time this article was published. This article will be updated as and when responses to the queries are received.

Tree Felling and Species Affected

The trees that will be felled for the project include several species like Sal, the rich wood of which is used for construction purposes; Mahua, the flower buds of which are used to brew a potent liquor; teak, another tree which is known for the quality of its wood; Jarul, a tree known for its medicinal uses and ornamental flowers; and Palash, the leaves of which are used to stitch eco-friendly dining plates and the resin of which is used in the leather and culinary industries.

The inventory of trees also includes wild guava or Ceylon oak, known for its medicinal uses; the golden shower tree, which is ornamental and has medicinal uses; and Tendu trees, the leaves of which are used to roll traditional Indian cigars called beedis and which also produce an edible fruit during summer. The survey by the ministry’s regional office has also revealed that there is a lot of regeneration of trees in the forest land, particularly those of Tendu, Palash, and Jarul.

But discrepancies have been found in various surveys in so far as the total number of trees that have been identified for felling. Though the working plan indicates that 1,10,496 trees of various species and girth have been identified for felling, the regional office of the ministry has arrived at a figure of 1,07,051 based on the sampling method. The ministry’s regional office has computed this number by taking a sample size of 87 trees per hectare. This figure was found to be correct in the enumeration method when a counting exercise upon a plot measuring one hectare in area was undertaken randomly by the office.

Sampling Method Criticism

The joint site inspection report of the DFO (Singrauli) and CCF (Rewa) stated that although the total number of trees in the proposed diversion area, enumerated as 1,07,051, was derived through the sampling method by taking about 10 percent of the total area for diversion, there might be “considerable variation between the said figure and the actual number of trees involved in the proposal.”

This report flagged potential errors in calculation because the samples over which enumeration was carried out are in areas like pits. As a result, this method does not provide a clear picture of the actual number of trees proposed to be felled.

“Therefore, it is advisable to take up total enumeration of the trees proposed for actual felling, including the area proposed for open-cast mining and external dumping of overburden in the forest land, species and girth class-wise, to arrive at the actual number of trees to be felled,” the report recommended.

However, the FAC rejected this recommendation by citing that the method was in accordance with the ministry’s guidelines. “Total enumeration is necessary only up to 10 hectares. For larger areas, species-wise and diameter class-wise abstract of trees may be computed either from the working plans or by standard sampling methods. Thus, the sampling can be done for the larger areas; however, it is important to ensure that the sampling is adequate enough to provide a true representation of the area,” it said.

The FAC has, however, asked the ministry’s regional office to re-examine and ensure that the sampling is adequate and that the number of trees finally identified for felling truly represents the forest density of the area.

Water Bodies Affected

The forest land proposed for diversion has two important tributaries flowing through it: the Bandha Nallah, which falls under the catchment area of the Sone River, and the Kachanmuda Nallah, which flows into the Rihand Dam. It was brought to the attention of the FAC that both water bodies flow directly through the mining lease area.

The Madhya Pradesh government informed the FAC that a scientific study of the hydrological regime of the region has already been conducted and the recommendations of the study have been approved by the state’s water resources department. The details of the study and its recommendations do not form part of the FAC minutes of the meeting.

The 5 million tons per annum mining project has been proposed at a cost of Rs 2,600 crore. The coal reserve of the Bandha block is around 560 million tons, and mining operations are projected to take place over a period of 45 years. The 807.917 hectares of forest land are part of 1,850.94 hectares of lease area spread across five villages – Bandha, Tenduha, Pidarwah, Deori, and Pachaur – in the district’s Sarai tehsil.

In August 2023, the ministry’s Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) recommended environmental clearance for the project, despite a contentious claim by the Madhya Pradesh government that clearing the vast forest land – equivalent to more than 1,500 football fields – will affect the livelihood of just two individuals. Both individuals identified by the state government belong to the Scheduled Tribe community.

Livelihood Concerns and Forest Rights Act

On the other hand, local communities allege that the majority of the population in the region are dependent on forest resources as their only source of livelihood. According to data compiled by the Madhya Pradesh government, a whopping 1,569 of the 3,551 project-affected persons belong to various Adivasi (or Scheduled Tribe) communities.

This apparent anomaly, in a mining project where over 40 percent of affected persons belong to Scheduled Tribe communities, has in the past been attributed to poor implementation of the Forest Rights Act, 2006, in Madhya Pradesh.

The state government has launched a portal-cum-mobile application for the settlement of forest right claims, which has been the subject of major controversy. The Act envisages that the claims should be settled through a three-tier structure at the district level, with the Gram Sabha (self-governing councils comprising all adults of voting age in any village) at its lowest rung.

A writ petition against this method of claim settlement, which was filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court in July 2021, is still pending for disposal even after three years.

Latest surveys seem to suggest that there are more forest-dependent people living in the project-affected area than have been identified and compensated by the state government. The ministry’s regional office found in its survey that a small community continues to live over a particular compartment of reserved forest, measuring 31.94 hectares, which has been earmarked for diversion.

It was also found that this community was practicing agriculture in their settlement inside the reserved forest. The true nature of this occupied patch (marked as ENCR in revenue records) is yet to be determined.

“Regional Office has informed that in an area of 31.94 ha in RF [Reserved Forests] -291, cultivation was in practice and a small population was also found to be staying in their individual houses built there. In the forest stock map, the same area was marked as 'ENCR.' The regional office informed the FAC that the exact status of the forest land under occupation was being determined by the forest and revenue departments of Madhya Pradesh. However, the FAC seemed satisfied with the Madhya Pradesh government’s rather unclear response that a Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R&R) Plan has a

login-icon

Unlock this story for free.

Simply log in with your email ID and immerse yourself in a world where exclusive insights and compelling narratives come alive.